↓ Skip to main content

新型コロナウイルスの補完代替医療 ― アビガンの外来処方体制の確立を急げ ―

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
新型コロナウイルスの補完代替医療 ― アビガンの外来処方体制の確立を急げ ―
Published in
Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, May 2020
DOI 10.1625/jcam.17.83
Authors

Nobutaka SUZUKI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#23
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,813
of 395,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.