Title |
Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Menaka Pai, Nancy S Lloyd, Ji Cheng, Lehana Thabane, Frederick A Spencer, Deborah J Cook, R Brian Haynes, Holger J Schünemann, James D Douketis |
Abstract |
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common preventable cause of mortality in hospitalized medical patients. Despite rigorous randomized trials generating strong recommendations for anticoagulant use to prevent VTE, nearly 40% of medical patients receive inappropriate thromboprophylaxis. Knowledge-translation strategies are needed to bridge this gap. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 12% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
Other | 28 | 22% |
Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
Psychology | 9 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#13,891,094
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,415
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,529
of 284,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#31
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.