↓ Skip to main content

A Framework to Address Challenges in Communicating the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
A Framework to Address Challenges in Communicating the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40572-016-0102-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liana Winett, Lawrence Wallack, Dawn Richardson, Janne Boone-Heinonen, Lynne Messer

Abstract

Findings from the field of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) suggest that some of the most pressing public health problems facing communities today may begin much earlier than previously understood. In particular, this body of work provides evidence that social, physical, chemical, environmental, and behavioral influences in early life play a significant role in establishing vulnerabilities for chronic disease later in life. Further, because this work points to the importance of adverse environmental exposures that cluster in population groups, it suggests that existing opportunities to intervene at a population level may need to refocus their efforts "upstream" to sufficiently combat the fundamental causes of disease. To translate these findings into improved public health, however, the distance between scientific discovery and population application will need to be bridged by conversations across a breadth of disciplines and social roles. And importantly, those involved will likely begin without a shared vocabulary or conceptual starting point. The purpose of this paper is to support and inform the translation of DOHaD findings from the bench to population-level health promotion and disease prevention, by: (1) discussing the unique communication challenges inherent to translation of DOHaD for broad audiences, (2) introducing the First-hit/Second-hit Framework with an epidemiologic planning matrix as a model for conceptualizing and structuring communication around DOHaD, and (3) discussing the ways in which patterns of communicating DOHaD findings can expand the range of solutions considered and encourage discussion of population-level solutions in relation to one another, rather than in isolation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,538,215
of 24,865,967 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#190
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,743
of 372,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,865,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.