↓ Skip to main content

Promoting Health and Advancing Development through Improved Housing in Low-Income Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Promoting Health and Advancing Development through Improved Housing in Low-Income Settings
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11524-012-9773-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andy Haines, Nigel Bruce, Sandy Cairncross, Michael Davies, Katie Greenland, Alexandra Hiscox, Steve Lindsay, Tom Lindsay, David Satterthwaite, Paul Wilkinson

Abstract

There is major untapped potential to improve health in low-income communities through improved housing design, fittings, materials and construction. Adverse effects on health from inadequate housing can occur through a range of mechanisms, both direct and indirect, including as a result of extreme weather, household air pollution, injuries or burns, the ingress of disease vectors and lack of clean water and sanitation. Collaborative action between public health professionals and those involved in developing formal and informal housing could advance both health and development by addressing risk factors for a range of adverse health outcomes. Potential trade-offs between design features which may reduce the risk of some adverse outcomes whilst increasing the risk of others must be explicitly considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 148 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 21%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 17%
Social Sciences 18 12%
Engineering 17 11%
Environmental Science 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,553,461
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#218
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,909
of 282,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.