↓ Skip to main content

Gastrointestinal manifestations in Parkinson’s disease: prevalence and occurrence before motor symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Gastrointestinal manifestations in Parkinson’s disease: prevalence and occurrence before motor symptoms
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6801-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria G. Cersosimo, Gabriela B. Raina, Cristina Pecci, Alejandro Pellene, Cristian R. Calandra, Cristiam Gutiérrez, Federico E. Micheli, Eduardo E. Benarroch

Abstract

To assess the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) compared to control subjects and their timing of appearance in relationship to the onset of motor symptoms. There is a rostrocaudal gradient of alpha-synuclein (α-SYN) neuropathology in the enteric nervous system at early stages of PD with higher burden in the upper than the lower gut. However, only constipation has been recognized as a premotor gastrointestinal manifestation of PD. 129 PD patients and 120 controls underwent a structured questionnaire to assess the presence of GIS and, in PD patients, the time of their appearance respect to the onset of motor manifestations. GIS significantly more prevalent in PD patients were dry mouth, drooling, dysphagia, constipation and defecatory dysfunction. Constipation and defecatory dysfunction preceded motor manifestations. Whereas gastroparesis symptoms preceded motor manifestations, their prevalence was not significantly different from controls. Despite evidence of a higher α-SYN burden in the upper gut, only constipation and defecatory dysfunction were prominent premotor GIS of PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 66 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 23%
Neuroscience 29 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 75 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,088,427
of 24,293,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,963
of 4,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,201
of 288,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,293,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.