You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Instrumental Methods (Spectroscopy, Electronic Nose, and Tongue) As Tools To Predict Taste and Aroma in Beverages: Advantages and Limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical Reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1021/cr300076c |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather Smyth, Daniel Cozzolino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 19% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 53 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Engineering | 21 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,675,320
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Reviews
#4,761
of 5,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,885
of 280,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Reviews
#37
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.