↓ Skip to main content

Genome‐wide linkage analysis for human longevity: Genetics of Healthy Aging Study

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Cell, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome‐wide linkage analysis for human longevity: Genetics of Healthy Aging Study
Published in
Aging Cell, February 2013
DOI 10.1111/acel.12039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marian Beekman, Hélène Blanché, Markus Perola, Anti Hervonen, Vladyslav Bezrukov, Ewa Sikora, Friederike Flachsbart, Lene Christiansen, Anton J. M. De Craen, Tom B. L. Kirkwood, Irene Maeve Rea, Michel Poulain, Jean‐Marie Robine, Silvana Valensin, Maria Antonietta Stazi, Giuseppe Passarino, Luca Deiana, Efstathios S. Gonos, Lavinia Paternoster, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Qihua Tan, Quinta Helmer, Erik B. van den Akker, Joris Deelen, Francesca Martella, Heather J. Cordell, Kristin L. Ayers, James W. Vaupel, Outi Törnwall, Thomas E. Johnson, Stefan Schreiber, Mark Lathrop, Axel Skytthe, Rudi G. J. Westendorp, Kaare Christensen, Jutta Gampe, Almut Nebel, Jeanine J. Houwing‐Duistermaat, Pieternella Eline Slagboom, Claudio Franceschi, the GEHA consortium

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Professor 10 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 25 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,506,104
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Aging Cell
#460
of 2,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,629
of 297,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Cell
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.