↓ Skip to main content

Association of Depression and Anxiety on Quality of Life, Treatment Adherence, and Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Association of Depression and Anxiety on Quality of Life, Treatment Adherence, and Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2012
DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2793-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Óscar Arrieta, Laura P. Angulo, Carolina Núñez-Valencia, Yuzmiren Dorantes-Gallareta, Eleazar O. Macedo, Dulce Martínez-López, Salvador Alvarado, José-Francisco Corona-Cruz, Luis F. Oñate-Ocaña

Abstract

Symptoms of depression and anxiety are common in patients with lung cancer and may produce an impact on both health-related quality of life (HRQL) and survival. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of depression and anxiety on HRQL, treatment adherence, and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 211 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 68 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,194,006
of 25,024,586 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#471
of 7,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,876
of 292,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,024,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.