↓ Skip to main content

Are Saunas Beneficial or Harmful for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease? Examination with Model Mouse

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are Saunas Beneficial or Harmful for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease? Examination with Model Mouse
Published in
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, May 2022
DOI 10.11390/onki.2345
Authors

Yoshihiro IWASHITA, Kousuke WATARU, Akira MAEDA, Kazuki SUGIMOTO, Syouko YAMADA, Junichi IIYAMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#52
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,469
of 445,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.