You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modes of climate variability bridge proximate and evolutionary mechanisms of masting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2020.0380 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Ascoli, Andrew Hacket-Pain, Ian S. Pearse, Giorgio Vacchiano, Susanna Corti, Paolo Davini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,433,608
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,497
of 7,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,030
of 441,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#76
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.