↓ Skip to main content

Cutaneous findings following COVID‐19 vaccination: review of world literature and own experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 5,970)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
375 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cutaneous findings following COVID‐19 vaccination: review of world literature and own experience
Published in
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology, November 2021
DOI 10.1111/jdv.17744
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is growing evidence that not only the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) but also the COVID-19 vaccines can cause a variety of skin reactions. In this review article, we provide a brief overview on cutaneous findings that have been observed since the emerging mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns all over the world. Unspecific injection site reactions very early occurring after the vaccination are most frequent. Type I hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis) likely due to allergy to ingredients may rarely occur but can be severe. Type IV hypersensitivity reactions may be observed, including delayed large local skin lesions ("COVID arm"), inflammatory reactions in dermal filler or previous radiation sites or even old BCG scars, and more commonly moribilliform and erythema multiforme-like rashes. Autoimmune-mediated skin findings after COVID-19 vaccination include leukocytoclastic vasculitis, lupus erythematosus, and immune thrombocytopenia. Functional angiopathies (chilblain-like lesions, erythromelalgia) may also be observed. Pityriasis rosea-like rashes and reactivation of herpes zoster have also been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. In conclusion, there are numerous cutaneous reaction patterns that may occur following COVID-19 vaccination, whereby many of these skin findings are of immunological/autoimmunological nature. Importantly, molecular mimicry exists between SARS-CoV-2 (e.g., the spike-protein sequences used to design the vaccines) and human components and may thus explain some COVID-19 pathologies as well adverse skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccinations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 375 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 76 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 79 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2026.
All research outputs
#171,244
of 34,843,411 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology
#31
of 5,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,952
of 476,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology
#7
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,843,411 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.