| Title |
Getting to Better Prescription Drug Information
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2222-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven Woloshin, Lisa M. Schwartz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2013.
All research outputs
#6,015,673
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,421
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,447
of 186,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#25
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.