↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of Echinaforce® in respiratory tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of Echinaforce® in respiratory tract infections
Published in
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10354-012-0166-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Schapowal

Abstract

Echinaforce® is the standardised extract of Echinacea purpurea from Bioforce, Switzerland. Recent studies show immunomodulation and broad antiviral effects against respiratory tract viruses. Haemagglutinin and Neuraminidase are blocked. In contrast to Oseltamivir no resistance is caused by Echinaforce®. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study over four months confirms that Echinaforce® supports the immune resistance and acts directly against a series of viruses. Echinaforce® is efficacious and safe in respiratory tract infections for long-term and short-term prevention as well as for acute treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 33%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,052,116
of 23,978,545 outputs
Outputs from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#90
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,368
of 287,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,545 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.