↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Bimolecular Reaction Models for Stochastic Reaction–Diffusion Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of Bimolecular Reaction Models for Stochastic Reaction–Diffusion Systems
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11538-013-9833-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. C. Agbanusi, S. A. Isaacson

Abstract

Stochastic reaction-diffusion models have become an important tool in studying how both noise in the chemical reaction process and the spatial movement of molecules influences the behavior of biological systems. There are two primary spatially-continuous models that have been used in recent studies: the diffusion limited reaction model of Smoluchowski, and a second approach popularized by Doi. Both models treat molecules as points undergoing Brownian motion. The former represents chemical reactions between two reactants through the use of reactive boundary conditions, with two molecules reacting instantly upon reaching a fixed separation (called the reaction-radius). The Doi model uses reaction potentials, whereby two molecules react with a fixed probability per unit time, λ, when separated by less than the reaction radius. In this work, we study the rigorous relationship between the two models. For the special case of a protein diffusing to a fixed DNA binding site, we prove that the solution to the Doi model converges to the solution of the Smoluchowski model as λ→∞, with a rigorous [Formula: see text] error bound (for any fixed ϵ>0). We investigate by numerical simulation, for biologically relevant parameter values, the difference between the solutions and associated reaction time statistics of the two models. As the reaction-radius is decreased, for sufficiently large but fixed values of λ, these differences are found to increase like the inverse of the binding radius.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Saudi Arabia 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Master 7 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 23%
Mathematics 4 10%
Computer Science 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,178,031
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#992
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,578
of 198,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.