↓ Skip to main content

Part 10: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Part 10: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support
Published in
Circulation, October 2010
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.110.971093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica E. Kleinman, Allan R. de Caen, Leon Chameides, Dianne L. Atkins, Robert A. Berg, Marc D. Berg, Farhan Bhanji, Dominique Biarent, Robert Bingham, Ashraf H. Coovadia, Mary Fran Hazinski, Robert W. Hickey, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Amelia G. Reis, Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez, James Tibballs, Arno L. Zaritsky, David Zideman, Ian Adatia, Richard P. Aickin, John Berger, Jeffrey M. Berman, Desmond Bohn, Kate L. Brown, Mark G. Coulthard, Douglas S. Diekema, Aaron Donoghue, Jonathan Duff, Jonathan R. Egan, Christoph B. Eich, Diana G. Fendya, Ericka L. Fink, Loh Tsee Foong, Eugene B. Freid, Susan Fuchs, Anne-Marie Guerguerian, Bradford D. Harris, George M. Hoffman, James S. Hutchison, Sharon B. Kinney, Sasa Kurosawa, Jesús Lopez-Herce, Sharon E. Mace, Ian Maconochie, Duncan Macrae, Mioara D. Manole, Bradley S. Marino, Felipe Martinez, Reylon A. Meeks, Alfredo Misraji, Marilyn Morris, Akira Nishisaki, Masahiko Nitta, Gabrielle Nuthall, Sergio Pesutic Perez, Lester T. Proctor, Faiqa A. Qureshi, Sergio Rendich, Ricardo A. Samson, Kennith Sartorelli, Stephen M. Schexnayder, William Scott, Vijay Srinivasan, Robert M. Sutton, Mark Terry, Shane Tibby, Alexis Topjian, Elise W. van der Jagt, David Wessel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 213 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 16%
Other 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 10%
Student > Master 22 9%
Other 57 25%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 58 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,339,480
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#4,931
of 21,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,664
of 109,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#27
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.