You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The SARS-CoV-2 main protease Mpro causes microvascular brain pathology by cleaving NEMO in brain endothelial cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-021-00926-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Wenzel, Josephine Lampe, Helge Müller-Fielitz, Raphael Schuster, Marietta Zille, Kristin Müller, Markus Krohn, Jakob Körbelin, Linlin Zhang, Ümit Özorhan, Vanessa Neve, Julian U. G. Wagner, Denisa Bojkova, Mariana Shumliakivska, Yun Jiang, Anke Fähnrich, Fabian Ott, Valentin Sencio, Cyril Robil, Susanne Pfefferle, Florent Sauve, Caio Fernando Ferreira Coêlho, Jonas Franz, Frauke Spiecker, Beate Lembrich, Sonja Binder, Nina Feller, Peter König, Hauke Busch, Ludovic Collin, Roberto Villaseñor, Olaf Jöhren, Hermann C. Altmeppen, Manolis Pasparakis, Stefanie Dimmeler, Jindrich Cinatl, Klaus Püschel, Matija Zelic, Dimitry Ofengeim, Christine Stadelmann, François Trottein, Ruben Nogueiras, Rolf Hilgenfeld, Markus Glatzel, Vincent Prevot, Markus Schwaninger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,323 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 760 | 12% |
| Germany | 323 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 311 | 5% |
| Canada | 283 | 4% |
| Australia | 123 | 2% |
| Italy | 118 | 2% |
| France | 116 | 2% |
| Japan | 91 | 1% |
| Spain | 68 | 1% |
| Other | 666 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3464 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5477 | 87% |
| Scientists | 460 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 279 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 97 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 206 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 83 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3926. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,289
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#5
of 5,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87
of 443,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.