You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Aging Hand and the Ergonomics of Hearing Aid Controls
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ear and hearing (Print), January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1097/aud.0b013e31825f9bba |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gurjit Singh, M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, Donald Hayes, Herbert P. von Schroeder, Heather Carnahan |
Abstract |
The authors investigated the effects of hand function and aging on the ability to manipulate different hearing instrument controls. Over the past quarter century, hearing aids and hearing aid controls have become increasingly miniaturized. It is important to investigate the aging hand and hearing aid ergonomics because most hearing aid wearers are adults aged 65 years and above, who may have difficulty handling these devices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 20% |
Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
Psychology | 6 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#16,580,596
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#1,126
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,958
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.