↓ Skip to main content

HAPRAP: a haplotype-based iterative method for statistical fine mapping using GWAS summary statistics

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HAPRAP: a haplotype-based iterative method for statistical fine mapping using GWAS summary statistics
Published in
Bioinformatics, September 2016
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Zheng, Santiago Rodriguez, Charles Laurin, Denis Baird, Lea Trela-Larsen, Mesut A Erzurumluoglu, Yi Zheng, Jon White, Claudia Giambartolomei, Delilah Zabaneh, Richard Morris, Meena Kumari, Juan P Casas, Aroon D Hingorani, UCLEB Consortium, David M Evans, Tom R Gaunt, Ian N M Day

Abstract

Fine mapping is a widely used approach for identifying the causal variant(s) at disease-associated loci. Standard methods (e.g. multiple regression) require individual level genotypes. Recent fine mapping methods using summary-level data require the pairwise correlation coefficients (r(2)) of the variants. However, haplotypes rather than pairwise r(2), are the true biological representation of linkage disequilibrium (LD) among multiple loci. In this paper, we present an empirical iterative method, HAPlotype Regional Association analysis Program (HAPRAP), that enables fine mapping using summary statistics and haplotype information from an individual-level reference panel. Simulations with individual-level genotypes show that the results of HAPRAP and multiple regression are highly consistent. In simulation with summary-level data, we demonstrate that HAPRAP is less sensitive to poor LD estimates. In a parametric simulation using Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) height data, HAPRAP performs well with a small training sample size (N<2000) while other methods become suboptimal. Moreover, HAPRAP's performance is not affected substantially by SNPs with low minor allele frequencies. We applied the method to existing quantitative trait and binary outcome meta-analyses (human height, QTc interval and gallbladder disease); all previous reported association signals were replicated and two additional variants were independently associated with human height. Due to the growing availability of summary level data, the value of HAPRAP is likely to increase markedly for future analyses (e.g. functional prediction and identification of instruments for Mendelian randomization). The HAPRAP package and documentation are available online: http://apps.biocompute.org.uk/haprap.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Mathematics 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,186,648
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#2,049
of 7,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,636
of 338,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#45
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.