↓ Skip to main content

Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?
Published in
Human Genetics, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00439-011-0987-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Caulfield

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing continues to receive significant attention from both the popular press and policymakers. While the demand for these services has not, to date, been significant, it nevertheless seems likely that more and more individuals will be accessing DTC services. As a result, commentators have suggested that the DTC industry requires more oversight. A common rationale for policy action is that DTC services might cause undue anxiety. However, emerging evidence suggests that this is not the case. Indeed, it appears that genetic risk information has little impact on individual behavior or anxiety levels. Though more research is clearly needed, this type of research should inform the regulatory response to DTC services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 53 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 19%
Social Sciences 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Philosophy 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,935,193
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#935
of 2,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,805
of 120,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.