↓ Skip to main content

Attentional switching forms a genetic link between attention problems and autistic traits in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attentional switching forms a genetic link between attention problems and autistic traits in adults
Published in
Psychological Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1017/s0033291712002863
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. J. C. Polderman, R. A. Hoekstra, A. A. E. Vinkhuyzen, P. F. Sullivan, S. van der Sluis, D. Posthuma

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and autistic traits often occur together. The pattern and etiology of co-occurrence are largely unknown, particularly in adults. This study investigated the co-occurrence between both traits in detail, and subsequently examined the etiology of the co-occurrence, using two independent adult population samples. Method Data on ADHD traits (Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity) were collected in a population sample (S1, n = 559) of unrelated individuals. Data on Attention Problems (AP) were collected in a population-based family sample of twins and siblings (S2, n = 560). In both samples five dimensions of autistic traits were assessed (social skills, routine, attentional switching, imagination, patterns).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 19 13%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,356,473
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#1,162
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,873
of 290,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#12
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.