↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Psychosocial Stressors of Well-Being and Factors Related to Substance Use Among Latino Day Laborers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Identifying Psychosocial Stressors of Well-Being and Factors Related to Substance Use Among Latino Day Laborers
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10903-010-9413-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nalini Junko Negi

Abstract

Day labor is largely comprised of young Latino immigrant men, many of who are undocumented, and thus vulnerable to a myriad of workers' rights abuses. The difficult work and life conditions of this marginalized population may place them at heightened risk for mental health problems and substance use and abuse. However, factors related to Latino day laborers' well-being and substance misuse are largely unknown. This article utilizes ethnographic and focus group methodology to elucidate participant identified factors associated to well-being and substance use and abuse. This study has implications for informing public health and social service programming as it provides thick description regarding the context and circumstances associated to increased vulnerability to substance abuse and lack of well-being among this hard-to-reach population of Latino immigrants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 22%
Psychology 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,308,386
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#260
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,614
of 187,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.