You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the ‘strengthening families, strengthening communities’ group-based parenting programme: study protocol and initial insights
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11912-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annemarie Lodder, Anita Mehay, Hana Pavlickova, Zoe Hoare, Leandra Box, Jabeer Butt, Tim Weaver, Mike J. Crawford, Donna Clutterbuck, Nicola Westbrook, Karlet Manning, Saffron Karlsen, Steve Morris, Andrew Brand, Paul Ramchandani, Yvonne Kelly, Anja Heilmann, Richard G. Watt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,139,293
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,502
of 14,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,832
of 435,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#186
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.