↓ Skip to main content

Using Recovery Modalities between Training Sessions in Elite Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
431 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1083 Mendeley
Title
Using Recovery Modalities between Training Sessions in Elite Athletes
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200636090-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Barnett

Abstract

Achieving an appropriate balance between training and competition stresses and recovery is important in maximising the performance of athletes. A wide range of recovery modalities are now used as integral parts of the training programmes of elite athletes to help attain this balance. This review examined the evidence available as to the efficacy of these recovery modalities in enhancing between-training session recovery in elite athletes. Recovery modalities have largely been investigated with regard to their ability to enhance the rate of blood lactate removal following high-intensity exercise or to reduce the severity and duration of exercise-induced muscle injury and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Neither of these reflects the circumstances of between-training session recovery in elite athletes. After high-intensity exercise, rest alone will return blood lactate to baseline levels well within the normal time period between the training sessions of athletes. The majority of studies examining exercise-induced muscle injury and DOMS have used untrained subjects undertaking large amounts of unfamiliar eccentric exercise. This model is unlikely to closely reflect the circumstances of elite athletes. Even without considering the above limitations, there is no substantial scientific evidence to support the use of the recovery modalities reviewed to enhance the between-training session recovery of elite athletes. Modalities reviewed were massage, active recovery, cryotherapy, contrast temperature water immersion therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, compression garments, stretching, electromyostimulation and combination modalities. Experimental models designed to reflect the circumstances of elite athletes are needed to further investigate the efficacy of various recovery modalities for elite athletes. Other potentially important factors associated with recovery, such as the rate of post-exercise glycogen synthesis and the role of inflammation in the recovery and adaptation process, also need to be considered in this future assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,083 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 1%
Brazil 7 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Qatar 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 1040 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 216 20%
Student > Bachelor 215 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 10%
Researcher 85 8%
Student > Postgraduate 75 7%
Other 205 19%
Unknown 177 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 499 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 146 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 5%
Social Sciences 28 3%
Other 80 7%
Unknown 212 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,926,952
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,363
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,722
of 285,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#202
of 784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.