↓ Skip to main content

Use of gesture sequences in captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) play

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Use of gesture sequences in captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) play
Published in
Animal Cognition, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0587-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maureen S. McCarthy, Mary Lee Abshire Jensvold, Deborah H. Fouts

Abstract

This study examined the use of sensory modalities relative to a partner's behavior in gesture sequences during captive chimpanzee play at the Chimpanzee and Human Communication Institute. We hypothesized that chimpanzees would use visual gestures toward attentive recipients and auditory/tactile gestures toward inattentive recipients. We also hypothesized that gesture sequences would be more prevalent toward unresponsive rather than responsive recipients. The chimpanzees used significantly more auditory/tactile rather than visual gestures first in sequences with both attentive and inattentive recipients. They rarely used visual gestures toward inattentive recipients. Auditory/tactile gestures were effective with and used with both attentive and inattentive recipients. Recipients responded significantly more to single gestures than to first gestures in sequences. Sequences often indicated that recipients did not respond to initial gestures, whereas effective single gestures made more gestures unnecessary. The chimpanzees thus gestured appropriately relative to a recipient's behavior and modified their interactions according to contextual social cues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 35%
Psychology 14 21%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Unspecified 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#3,146,835
of 23,884,093 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#589
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,087
of 286,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.