↓ Skip to main content

Effect and Treatment of Chronic Pain in Inflammatory Arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Effect and Treatment of Chronic Pain in Inflammatory Arthritis
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11926-012-0300-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne C. Lee

Abstract

Pain is the most common reason patients with inflammatory arthritis see a rheumatologist. Patients consistently rate pain as one of their highest priorities, and pain is the single most important determinant of patient global assessment of disease activity. Although pain is commonly interpreted as a marker of inflammation, the correlation between pain intensity and measures of peripheral inflammation is imperfect. The prevalence of chronic, non-inflammatory pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia is higher among patients with inflammatory arthritis than in the general population. Inflammatory arthritis patients with fibromyalgia have higher measures of disease activity and lower quality of life than inflammatory patients who do not have fibromyalgia. This review article focuses on current literature involving the effects of pain on disease assessment and quality of life for patients with inflammatory arthritis. It also reviews non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic options for treatment of pain for patients with inflammatory arthritis, focusing on the implications of comorbidities and concurrent disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. Although several studies have examined the effects of reducing inflammation for patients with inflammatory arthritis, very few clinical trials have examined the safety and efficacy of treatment directed specifically towards pain pathways. Most studies have been small, have focused on rheumatoid arthritis or mixed populations (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis plus osteoarthritis), and have been at high risk of bias. Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to examine the mechanisms of pain in inflammatory arthritis and to determine the safety and efficacy of analgesic medications in this specific patient population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 213 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 51 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 58 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,902,660
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#60
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,633
of 278,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.