↓ Skip to main content

Research Recruitment Using Facebook Advertising: Big Potential, Big Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,328)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
123 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Research Recruitment Using Facebook Advertising: Big Potential, Big Challenges
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13187-012-0443-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie M. Kapp, Colleen Peters, Debra Parker Oliver

Abstract

To our knowledge, ours is the first study to report on Facebook advertising as an exclusive mechanism for recruiting women ages 35-49 years residing in the USA into a health-related research study. We directed our survey to women ages 35-49 years who resided in the USA exclusively using three Facebook advertisements. Women were then redirected to our survey site. There were 20,568,960 women on Facebook that met the eligibility criteria. The three ads resulted in 899,998 impressions with a reach of 374,225 women. Of the women reached, 280 women (0.075 %) clicked the ad. Of the women who clicked the ad, nine women (3.2 %) proceeded past the introductory page. Social networking, and in particular Facebook, is an innovative venue for recruiting participants for research studies. Challenges include developing an ad to foster interest without biasing the sample, and motivating women who click the ad to complete the survey. There is still much to learn about this potential method of recruitment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 4 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 202 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 22%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 19%
Psychology 33 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Computer Science 15 7%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#429,764
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#2
of 1,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,930
of 290,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them