Title |
Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10531-012-0421-0 |
Authors |
Edgar A. van der Grift, Rodney van der Ree, Lenore Fahrig, Scott Findlay, Jeff Houlahan, Jochen A. G. Jaeger, Nina Klar, L. Francisco Madriñan, Leif Olson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | <1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 1% |
Unknown | 466 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 87 | 18% |
Researcher | 86 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 62 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 12% |
Other | 27 | 6% |
Other | 66 | 14% |
Unknown | 102 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 189 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 126 | 26% |
Engineering | 18 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 1% |
Other | 21 | 4% |
Unknown | 119 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,356,748
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#783
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,549
of 290,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.