↓ Skip to main content

Augmenting the narrow-based breast: The unfurling technique to prevent the double-bubble deformity

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Augmenting the narrow-based breast: The unfurling technique to prevent the double-bubble deformity
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01578320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles L. Puckett, Matthew J. Concannon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,260,208
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#693
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,042
of 59,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.