↓ Skip to main content

The Troubling Persistence of Race in Pharmacogenomics

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Troubling Persistence of Race in Pharmacogenomics
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00717.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Kahn

Abstract

This article is concerned about what may be happening to race and medicine in the "meantime" between today's clinical realities and the promised land of pharmacogenomics where the need for using race in medicine is supposed to fade away. It argues that previous debates over the use of race in medicine are being side-stepped as race is being reconfigured from a "crude surrogate" for genetic variation into a purportedly viable placeholder for variable drug response--to be used here and now until the specific genetic underpinnings of drug response are more fully understood. Embracing the trope of "promise" in pharmacogenomics alongside the idea of using race as a useful interim proxy for genetic variation raises concerns that new diagnostic and therapeutic interventions may reflect or be mapped upon existing social categories of race, class, gender, and ethnicity in a harmful or dangerous manner. At the most basic level, the politics of the meantime in pharmacogenomics may be promoting the scientifically unjustified and socially dangerous recasting of race as a social and historical construct into a reified genetic category.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Social Sciences 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%