↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation of human ES cell line KIND-2 to yield tripotent cardiovascular progenitors

Overview of attention for article published in In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Differentiation of human ES cell line KIND-2 to yield tripotent cardiovascular progenitors
Published in
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11626-012-9558-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harsha Pawani, Punam Nagvenkar, Prasad Pethe, Deepa Bhartiya

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have the ability to differentiate into all the three lineages and are an ideal starting material to obtain cells of desired lineage for regenerative medicine. Continued efforts are needed to evolve more robust protocols to obtain cells of desired lineages and in larger numbers. Also, it has now been realized that rather than transplanting fully committed cells differentiated in vitro, it may be ideal to transplant committed progenitors which retain the intrinsic ability to proliferate and also differentiate better into multiple lineages based on the in vivo cues. For cardiac regeneration, the desired progenitor is a multipotent cardiovascular progenitor which has the ability to regenerate cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and also smooth muscle cells. The present study was undertaken to carefully compare three widely used protocols to differentiate hESCs into cardiac progenitors, viz., spontaneous differentiation, differentiation by END-2-conditioned medium, and directed differentiation using growth factors followed by quantitative PCR to study the relative expression of early cardiovascular markers. hESC differentiation mimicked the early embryonic development, and the transition into mesoendoderm, mesoderm, early cardiac progenitors, and cardiac cells associated with spontaneous beating was clearly evident in all the three groups. However, compared to spontaneous and END-2-associated differentiation, directed differentiation led to several-fold higher expression of cardiac transcripts (>75-fold Nkx2.5 and >150-fold Tbx5) in response to the stage-specific addition of well-established cardiogenic inducers and inhibitors of specific signaling pathways. We propose to use tripotent cardiovascular progenitors derived by directed differentiation for further preclinical studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,178,031
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#664
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,672
of 280,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.