↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanics and injury risk of a headbutt

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Biomechanics and injury risk of a headbutt
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00414-011-0617-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiri Adamec, Vera Mai, Matthias Graw, Klaus Schneider, John-Martin Hempel, Jutta Schöpfer

Abstract

Headbutt is a relevant type of a criminal assault that can result in injuries. The aim of this study was to collect basic biomechanical data and assess the injury risk associated with a headbutt. Series of measurements were carried out with volunteers with and without relevant soccer heading experience, and the impact velocity of the striking head was measured. A soccer ball was used as a surrogate of the stationary victim's head. Two scenarios were considered: one corresponding to the typical headbutt situation, i.e. short movement of the assailant's head without backswing, and one representing the worst case, i.e. the most severe head impact without time or space constraints for the assailant. The results as well as epidemiological data from court cases and a large Munich's university clinic show that a typical headbutt is not likely to lead to life-threatening injuries, but bony injuries of the face can easily occur. Under certain circumstances (support of the victim's head, secondary impact on the ground etc.), severe injuries with potentially lethal outcomes are possible. A thorough analysis of each case is thus an imperative. The (soccer) heading experience does not influence the velocity of the headbutt.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 13 26%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Engineering 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,292,628
of 24,004,724 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#82
of 2,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,098
of 116,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,004,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.