You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What counts as a weak tie? A comparison of filtering techniques to analyze co-exposure networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Networks, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socnet.2021.10.002 |
| Authors |
Subhayan Mukerjee, Tian Yang, Georg Stadler, Sandra González-Bailón |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Singapore | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 71% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,691,436
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Social Networks
#174
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,755
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Networks
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.