You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why doesn’t integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociology of Health & Illness, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.13398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gemma Hughes, Sara E. Shaw, Trisha Greenhalgh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 43 | 40% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 52 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 56% |
| Scientists | 30 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#659,894
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#48
of 2,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,827
of 445,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.