Title |
Epistatic study reveals two genetic interactions in blood pressure regulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Genomics, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2350-14-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ndeye Coumba Ndiaye, El Shamieh Said, Maria G Stathopoulou, Gérard Siest, Michael Y Tsai, Sophie Visvikis-Siest |
Abstract |
Although numerous candidate gene and genome-wide association studies have been performed on blood pressure, a small number of regulating genetic variants having a limited effect have been identified. This phenomenon can partially be explained by possible gene-gene/epistasis interactions that were little investigated so far. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 25% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,102
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,928
of 290,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.