↓ Skip to main content

Influence of experimental snow removal on root and canopy physiology of sugar maple trees in a northern hardwood forest

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Influence of experimental snow removal on root and canopy physiology of sugar maple trees in a northern hardwood forest
Published in
Oecologia, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2393-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel P. Comerford, Paul G. Schaberg, Pamela H. Templer, Anne M. Socci, John L. Campbell, Kimberly F. Wallin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,061,741
of 24,174,783 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#98
of 4,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,777
of 166,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,174,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.