↓ Skip to main content

When species’ ranges meet: assessing differences in habitat selection between sympatric large carnivores

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
When species’ ranges meet: assessing differences in habitat selection between sympatric large carnivores
Published in
Oecologia, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2546-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geir Rune Rauset, Jenny Mattisson, Henrik Andrén, Guillaume Chapron, Jens Persson

Abstract

Differentiation in habitat selection among sympatric species may depend on niche partitioning, species interactions, selection mechanisms and scales considered. In a mountainous area in Sweden, we explored hierarchical habitat selection in Global Positioning System-collared individuals of two sympatric large carnivore species; an obligate predator, the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), and a generalist predator and scavenger, the wolverine (Gulo gulo). Although the species' fundamental niches differ widely, their ranges overlap in this area where they share a prey base and main cause of mortality. Both lynx and wolverines selected for steep and rugged terrain in mountainous birch forest and in heaths independent of scale and available habitats. However, the selection of lynx for their preferred habitats was stronger when they were forming home ranges and they selected the same habitats within their home ranges independent of home range composition. Wolverines displayed a greater variability when selecting home ranges and habitat selection also varied with home range composition. Both species selected for habitats that promote survival through limited encounters with humans, but which also are rich in prey, and selection for these habitats was accordingly stronger in winter when human activity was high and prey density was low. We suggest that the observed differences between the species result primarily from different foraging strategies, but may also depend on differences in ranging and resting behaviour, home range size, and relative density of each species. Our results support the prediction that sympatric carnivores with otherwise diverging niches can select for the same resources when sharing main sources of food and mortality.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 200 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 19%
Student > Master 39 18%
Researcher 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 14 6%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 56%
Environmental Science 42 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 42 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,178,663
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,604
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,015
of 278,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.