↓ Skip to main content

Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12630-009-9252-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denis Tran, Allaudin A. Kamani, Elias Al-Attas, Victoria A. Lessoway, Simon Massey, Robert N. Rohling

Abstract

PURPOSE: In conventional practice of epidural needle placement, determining the interspinous level and choosing the puncture site are based on palpation of anatomical landmarks, which can be difficult with some subjects. Thereafter, the correct passage of the needle towards the epidural space is a blind "feel as you go" method. An aim-and-insert single-operator ultrasound-guided epidural needle placement is described and demonstrated. METHOD: Nineteen subjects undergoing elective Cesarean delivery consented to undergo both a pre-puncture ultrasound scan and real-time paramedian ultrasound-guidance for needle insertion. Following were the study objectives: to measure the success of a combined spinal-epidural needle insertion under real-time guidance, to compare the locations of the chosen interspinous levels as determined by both ultrasound and palpation, to measure the change in depth of the epidural space from the skin surface as pressure is applied to the ultrasound transducer, and to investigate the geometric limitations of using a fixed needle guide. RESULTS: One subject did not participate in the study because pre-puncture ultrasound examination showed unrecognizable bony landmarks. In 18 of 19 subjects, the epidural needle entered the epidural space successfully, as defined by a loss-of-resistance. In two subjects, entry into the epidural space was not achieved despite ultrasound guidance. Eighteen of the 19 interspinous spaces that were identified using palpation were consistent with those determined by ultrasound. The transducer pressure changed the depth of the epidural space by 2.8 mm. The measurements of the insertion lengths corresponded with the geometrical model of the needle guide, but the needle required a larger insertion angle than would be needed without the guide. CONCLUSION: This small study demonstrates the feasibility of the ultrasound-guidance technique. Areas for further development are identified for both ultrasound software and physical design.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 68%
Engineering 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,014,092
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#826
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,491
of 186,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.