↓ Skip to main content

Impact of plain packaging of tobacco products on smoking in adults and children: an elicitation of international experts’ estimates

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
35 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of plain packaging of tobacco products on smoking in adults and children: an elicitation of international experts’ estimates
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Pechey, David Spiegelhalter, Theresa M Marteau

Abstract

Governments sometimes face important decisions in the absence of direct evidence. In these cases, expert elicitation methods can be used to quantify uncertainty. We report the results of an expert elicitation study regarding the likely impact on smoking rates in adults and children of plain packaging of tobacco products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Psychology 7 13%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#732,175
of 24,403,034 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#753
of 16,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,660
of 291,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,403,034 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.