| Title |
Enteral stenting versus gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2712-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mouen Khashab, Ahmad S. Alawad, Eun Ji Shin, Katherine Kim, Nicolas Bourdel, Vikesh K. Singh, Anne Marie Lennon, Susan Hutfless, Reem Z. Sharaiha, Stuart Amateau, Patrick I. Okolo, Martin A. Makary, Christopher Wolfgang, Marcia Irene Canto, Anthony N. Kalloo |
| Abstract |
Endoscopic placement of enteral self-expandable metallic stents is an alternative to surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ) for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Factors associated with clinical outcomes are not known. The aims of this study are to compare the overall complication rate and effectiveness (duration of oral intake) between endoscopic stenting (ES) and GJ in patients with GOO and identify predictors of clinical outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,731
of 6,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,295
of 282,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#124
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.