↓ Skip to main content

Federated repositories of X‐ray diffraction images

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Federated repositories of X‐ray diffraction images
Published in
Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), June 2008
DOI 10.1107/s0907444908015540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Androulakis, Jason Schmidberger, Mark A Bate, Ross DeGori, Anthony Beitz, Cyrus Keong, Bob Cameron, Sheena McGowan, Corrine J Porter, Andrew Harrison, Jane Hunter, Jennifer L Martin, Bostjan Kobe, Renwick C J Dobson, Michael W Parker, James C Whisstock, Joan Gray, Andrew Treloar, David Groenewegen, Neil Dickson, Ashley M Buckle

Abstract

There is a pressing need for the archiving and curation of raw X-ray diffraction data. This information is critical for validation, methods development and improvement of archived structures. However, the relatively large size of these data sets has presented challenges for storage in a single worldwide repository such as the Protein Data Bank archive. This problem can be avoided by using a federated approach, where each institution utilizes its institutional repository for storage, with a discovery service overlaid. Institutional repositories are relatively stable and adequately funded, ensuring persistence. Here, a simple repository solution is described, utilizing Fedora open-source database software and data-annotation and deposition tools that can be deployed at any site cheaply and easily. Data sets and associated metadata from federated repositories are given a unique and persistent handle, providing a simple mechanism for search and retrieval via web interfaces. In addition to ensuring that valuable data is not lost, the provision of raw data has several uses for the crystallographic community. Most importantly, structure determination can only be truly repeated or verified when the raw data are available. Moreover, the availability of raw data is extremely useful for the development of improved methods of image analysis and data processing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 5%
Denmark 2 5%
United States 2 5%
Spain 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 32 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Computer Science 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,534,407
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#1,921
of 2,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,050
of 96,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.