↓ Skip to main content

How to measure the quality of financial tweets

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Quantity, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
How to measure the quality of financial tweets
Published in
Quality & Quantity, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11135-015-0229-6
Authors

Paola Cerchiello, Paolo Giudici

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,383,207
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#362
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,930
of 262,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.