↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal shifts in the relative importance of local versus upstream sources of phosphorus to individual lakes in a chain

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Seasonal shifts in the relative importance of local versus upstream sources of phosphorus to individual lakes in a chain
Published in
Aquatic Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00027-016-0504-1
Authors

Cory P. McDonald, Richard C. Lathrop

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Librarian 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 37%
Environmental Science 5 26%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,383,207
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#363
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,968
of 336,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.