↓ Skip to main content

The automation of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
69 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The automation of systematic reviews
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmj.f139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 161 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Librarian 13 8%
Professor 11 7%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 22%
Computer Science 24 14%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#822,368
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#7,530
of 75,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,305
of 348,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#55
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.