You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The automation of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.f139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guy Tsafnat, Adam Dunn, Paul Glasziou, Enrico Coiera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 33 | 35% |
| United States | 11 | 12% |
| Australia | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Ghana | 1 | 1% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 52% |
| Scientists | 27 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 22% |
| Researcher | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Librarian | 15 | 10% |
| Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 24% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#496,735
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#5,749
of 64,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,491
of 291,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#45
of 803 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 803 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.