↓ Skip to main content

The nationalization of electoral cycles in the United States: a wavelet analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
The nationalization of electoral cycles in the United States: a wavelet analysis
Published in
Public Choice, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11127-012-0052-8
Authors

Luís Aguiar-Conraria, Pedro C. Magalhães, Maria Joana Soares

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 15%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 27%
Social Sciences 9 27%
Mathematics 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#1,044
of 1,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,124
of 282,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.