↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Body Position on Ventilation Distribution in Ventilated Preterm Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Body Position on Ventilation Distribution in Ventilated Preterm Infants
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0b013e31826e708a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith L. Hough, Leanne Johnston, Sandy Brauer, Paul Woodgate, Andreas Schibler

Abstract

Positioning is considered vital to the maintenance of good lung ventilation by optimizing oxygen transport and gas exchange in ventilated premature infants. Previous studies suggest that the prone position is advantageous; however, no data exist on regional ventilation distribution for this age group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#3,305
of 4,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,859
of 291,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#41
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.