↓ Skip to main content

Pap Screening Goals and Perceptions of Pain among Black, Latina, and Arab Women: Steps Toward Breaking down Psychological Barriers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Pap Screening Goals and Perceptions of Pain among Black, Latina, and Arab Women: Steps Toward Breaking down Psychological Barriers
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13187-012-0441-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie W. Gauss, Athur Mabiso, Karen Patricia Williams

Abstract

Understanding women's psychological barriers to getting Papanicolaou (Pap) screening has potential to impact cancer disparities. This study examined pain perceptions of Pap testing among black, Latina, and Arab women and goal setting to receive Pap tests. Data on 420 women, in a longitudinal study, were analyzed using Chi-square tests of differences and generalized linear mixed models. At baseline, 30.3 % of black and 35.5 % of Latina women perceived Pap tests to be very painful compared to 24.2 % of Arab women. Perceptions of pain influenced goal settings, such as scheduling a first ever Pap test (odds ratio=0.58, 95 % confidence interval 0.14-0.94). Immediately following the intervention, women's perception that Pap tests are very painful significantly declined (P value <0.001) with Arab and black women registering the greatest improvements (20.3 and 17.3 % reduction, respectively, compared to 8.4 % for Latina). Having the perception that the Pap test is very painful significantly reduces the likelihood of black, Latina, and Arab women setting the goal to schedule their first ever Pap test. Latina women are the least likely to improve their perception that the Pap test is very painful, though national statistics show they have the highest rates of morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer. These findings are instructive for designing tailored interventions to break down psychological barriers to Pap screening among underserved women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 105 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 24%
Social Sciences 22 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,159,409
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#503
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,725
of 281,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.