Title |
Implementing emergency admission risk prediction in general practice: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0146 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bridie Angela Evans, Jeremy Dale, Jan Davies, Hayley Hutchings, Mark Kingston, Alison Porter, Ian Russell, Victoria Williams, Helen Snooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 28 | 42% |
Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
United States | 4 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 55% |
Scientists | 18 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#653,713
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#270
of 4,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,910
of 435,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.