↓ Skip to main content

Don’t just fix it, make it better! Using frontline service employees to improve recovery performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Don’t just fix it, make it better! Using frontline service employees to improve recovery performance
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11747-012-0324-3
Authors

Gielis A. H. van der Heijden, Jeroen J. L. Schepers, Edwin J. Nijssen, Andrea Ordanini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cyprus 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 12%
Researcher 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 98 60%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2013.
All research outputs
#13,678,432
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#450
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,958
of 282,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.