| Title |
Objective adherence to positive airway pressure therapy in an Australian paediatric cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sleep and Breathing, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11325-016-1400-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rita Machaalani, Carla A Evans, Karen A. Waters |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to objectively measure adherence (compliance) and effectiveness of CPAP and BiLevel pressure support in an Australian paediatric population and determine factors associated with adherence outcomes. Data was collected as part of routine clinical care from 2011 to 2013. Adherence was recorded by downloads from the PAP device. "Adequate" adherence was defined as ≥4 h/night for 70 % of days used. Effectiveness of therapy was measured by polysomnography (PSG) pre- and post-PAP initiation. One year follow-up was undertaken to determine the long-term utilisation of PAP therapy. Ninety-nine children were included (55 CPAP, 44 BiLevel). Mean age and BMI z-score were 6.9 ± 5.5 years and 0.1 ± 2.0 for CPAP and 9.8 ± 5.9 years and -0.5 ± 2.6 for BiLevel, respectively. At initial download, adequate adherence was observed in 75 % of CPAP and 91 % of BiLevel users. Mean hours of use (per night) for all nights used was 6.8 ± 2.8 and 9.3 ± 3.6 h, respectively. PSG demonstrated that CPAP use was associated with >60 % decrease in the obstructive apnoea hypopnoea index (OAHI, 19.0 ± 18.4 to 2.4 ± 3.1; p < 0.001). BiLevel use was associated with improved baseline SaO2 and TcCO2 (SaO2, 92.5 ± 5.4 % to 95.5 ± 2.9 %; p = 0.001 and reduction in TcCO2, 50.0 ± 10.9 mmHg to 44.8 ± 7.6 mmHg; p = 0.01). At follow-up, 22 (40 %) patients on CPAP and 26 (59 %) on BiLevel continued with therapy, and amongst these, adequate adherence was maintained in 76 % of CPAP and 80 % of Bilevel users. In this Australian paediatric cohort (predominantly non-obese), adherence with BiLevel was greater than for CPAP. Over half of our population continue to utilise PAP therapy 1 year later, and amongst these cases, adequate adherence was maintained. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#20,323,943
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#1,011
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,898
of 336,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.