↓ Skip to main content

New Perspectives in Regeneration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 302: Neural Regeneration.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Neural Regeneration.
Chapter number 302
Book title
New Perspectives in Regeneration
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/82_2012_302
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-235809-8, 978-3-64-235810-4
Authors

Steward MM, Sridhar A, Meyer JS, Melissa M. Steward, Akshayalakshmi Sridhar, Jason S. Meyer, Steward, Melissa M., Sridhar, Akshayalakshmi, Meyer, Jason S.

Abstract

Regeneration of the nervous system requires either the repair or replacement of nerve cells that have been damaged by injury or disease. While lower organisms possess extensive capacity for neural regeneration, evolutionarily higher organisms including humans are limited in their ability to regenerate nerve cells, posing significant issues for the treatment of injury and disease of the nervous system. This chapter focuses on current approaches for neural regeneration, with a discussion of traditional methods to enhance neural regeneration as well as emerging concepts within the field such as stem cells and cellular reprogramming. Stem cells are defined by their ability to self-renew as well as their ability to differentiate into multiple cell types, and hence can serve as a source for cell replacement of damaged neurons. Traditionally, adult stem cells isolated from the hippocampus and subventricular zone have served as a source of neural stem cells for replacement purposes. With the advancement of pluripotent stem cells, including human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), new and exciting approaches for neural cell replacement are being developed. Furthermore, with increased understanding of the human genome and epigenetics, scientists have been successful in the direct genetic reprogramming of somatic cells to a neuronal fate, bypassing the intermediary pluripotent stage. Such breakthroughs have accelerated the timing of production of mature neuronal cell types from a patient-specific somatic cell source such as skin fibroblasts or mononuclear blood cells. While extensive hurdles remain to the translational application of such stem cell and reprogramming strategies, these approaches have revolutionized the field of regenerative biology and have provided innovative approaches for the potential regeneration of the nervous system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 29 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2014.
All research outputs
#12,674,736
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#338
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,650
of 282,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.